February 19, 2020
  • 4:15 pm معايدة صاحب الغبطةيوحنا العاشر بطريرك أنطاكية وسائر المشرقميلاد ٢٠١٩
  • 4:14 pm True Word of Life Church “LIVE” Worship
  • 4:14 pm World Famous Foot Model Sasha Soles Foot Worship
Understanding Yang Gang | 1791

Until Andrew Yang, few, if any, candidates
were talking about the rise of automation, spiraling birth rates, and historic rates
of addiction and mental illness. His first appearances such as those on Sam
Harris’ podcast didn’t generate much buzz. At that point, he was among the unlikeliest
of candidates for the Democratic nomination. Like many obscure figures before him, his
appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience caused a massive boost of public awareness. But it isn’t necessarily the Democratic
base rallying around him, which is far too busy with the politics of intersectionality. That much is to be expected when a huge number
of people who discover you come from Joe’s much more centrist podcast. It’s those who have a vague sense that these
issues are on the horizon, many of whom happen to be on the right. That a great number of those curious in the
candidacy of Andrew Yang aren’t on the left might come as a surprise to casual onlookers. After all, his single-issue mission of a universal
basic income sounds a lot more like socialist redistributionism rather than the blind allegiance
to free markets that overtook the right following the Reagan Revolution. Which more or less brings us to the rise of
the #YangGang meme’s newfound virality, and its connected meme of Potato Trump. Yang is riding a wave similar to that of Tucker
Carlson’s following his debate with Ben Shapiro on these same subjects. As a candidate, Donald Trump captured the
same mood in a roundabout way, through is hardline stances on immigration, his pledges
to restore manufacturing industries, and his efforts to attack the opiate crisis plaguing
those areas of the country. Yang goes a step further with his pledge to
tackle the opiate crisis even to the point of prosecuting pharmaceutical executives responsible. Trump ran on a platform of “only me.” Repeatedly he would famously tell us that
“only he” could fix any host of problems which have plagued the country for decades. Beyond the appointment of judges, he’s arguably
done little toward capturing the nostalgia behind “Making America Great Again.” At this point in Trump’s presidency, especially,
there’s a felt sense that the country is moving away from that vision regardless of
who is elected. As is well understood, Trump relied upon white
American support and frustrations in order to coast his way to narrow success. What makes Yang a unique outlier on the left
is that he’s neededly pointed out that among white Americans deaths now outnumber births
– a clear marker of familial decline. A
widespread notion exists in the brainy establishment ranks of Republicans and libertarians that
so long as we have cheap hamburgers and electronics, American communities can just be replaced
by new immigrants. That core communities of Americans can vanish
in the span of a few decades, an unprecedented development in this country, without vast
social ramifications–such as the ones we’re already witnessing. The reasons these events are unfolding are
incredibly complex and can be traced to no one development, but it can be said that this
isn’t a viable long-term solution. These problems can potentially be addressed
through tailored incentive structures to promote family creation, such as those which have
been promoted by Hungary and Israel. Trump has spent no time devoted to this subject
for some apparent reason, as though it is without dignity to address any subset of Americans
experiencing the evaporation of their communities. For this reason, some of Trump’s previously
most devoted followers are questioning their support of someone who looks a lot more like
George W. Bush than 2015 Donald Trump. This became glaringly obvious after the Trump
administration’s abject failure on his signature issue, as February marked a 12 year high for
illegal immigration. Because of a collective sense of social disintegration
and nihilism among the Trump base, the overall rationale behind the shift to Yang simply
boils down to this: if the country will veer in that direction anyway, we may as well strive
to not spend our days in economic insecurity–especially if your political views lean right, which
can literally cost you your job. But it isn’t just economic concerns that
has drawn support to Yang from the right. In response to a rising tide of technological
censorship, President Donald Trump, who far-leftists have called to be banned on many social media
platforms–including Twitter– is fundamentally uninterested in addressing this issue, only
advising fellow Republicans to “be good.” In stark contrast, Andrew Yang has gone as
far to say that social media conglomerates should be trust-busted for their mass-censorship
campaigns. Where you come down on that debate is besides
the point: it’s obviously more favorable to conservatives who obviously face the brunt
of censorship with no clear solution on the horizon. It’s largely for these reasons that pointing
to any one particular left wing policy listed on Yang’s website is viewed as irrelevant
by his right wing supporters. If even under a firebrand Republican administration
the country moves leftward, spending more than ever before, receiving more illegal immigrants
than under Obama, and seeing more technological censorship, why should a candidate willing
to tackle the issues of censorship and job displacement be written off? To the people running the meme factories that
have spurred the online appeal of Yang, Trump has failed to address these issues in any
serious way, while Yang is openly positioning himself as the one to do it–with the previously
mentioned $1000/mo “Freedom Dividend.” Roughly speaking, our economy is divided into
a few sectors: raw materials, manufacturing, and the service industry. Because America is a highly advanced economy,
it’s the service industry which produces most of our economic output. Obviously, this has been unprecedentedly disruptive
for communities that have historically relied upon the first two sectors. Libertarians cite these developments as being
positive; after all, they say, that signifies that we don’t have to engage in grueling
labor, and can instead focus on enjoying the fruit of that expanding economic pie. Materially, this is true. Regardless of this fact, you still have to
earn those goods by generating economic value. If we’re going to transition away from human
labor at an unprecedented rate, we must find a new way to manage the social and economic
costs that those displaced in a matter of years will inevitably bear the cost of. You could argue, as many do compellingly,
that predictions of massive human replacement by automation are grossly overestimated. After all, they point out, people have been
displaced by all sort of innovations (usually pointed to is the horse and buggy), but that
isn’t an argument against improving the country’s well-being as a whole. After all, people’s sense of purpose and
meaning is in large part derived from jobs and the feeling that they’re providing for
their families, not from how cheaply they can stream a tv show. And as many are quick to eject out of their
mouths, the rise of automation does mean cheaper products and services, but what’s missed
is the compromise that is made. The clear compromise is a country where new
jobs that are created are, not only less cognitively accessible, but more isolated and temporary. Today, one in five jobs are held by a person
under contract and within a decade, contractors and freelancers could make up half of the
American workforce. As a matter of practical reality, the formation
of local bonds, community, and camaraderie will always be put on the back burner in favor
of market efficiency – the next temporary gig. Being that the market itself is morally neutral,
and instead merely a means of meeting consumer demand as efficiently as possible, the disintegration
we are seeing manifested is a result of human choices as libertarians rush to point out. While it’s not the role of the state to
block this, shaping the incentive structure in a way where it makes sense for average
people to make choices that foster family and community would result in a healthier
country. How that is addressed or implemented is a
question that runs as deep as any. What’s as difficult to address is the reality
that jobs are becoming much, much more complex. One possible solution put forward to minimize
these effects is that we can begin a massive job retraining program. But these already exist, and the results aren’t
promising to say the least. This is a fact Andrew Yang addresses headlong,
correctly citing that the TAA, a federal jobs retraining program, found that only 37% of
program members were working in the field for which they were trained. That doesn’t paint an optimistic picture
if libertarian predictions about the state of the economy in 15 years don’t pan out
and it should certainly concern conservatives who allegedly prioritize the formation of
families above all else. More hardlined figures in this debate like
Tucker Carlson suggest we halt automation entirely, which some could potentially view
as far too heavy handed. Alternatively we can seek out a sophisticated
answer to the most complex issues any society has had to rise to meet. If we’re to be freed from human labor through
automation to make cheaper products, the consumers of those free markets have to have a means
by which to pay for them. In other words, in an economy of humanless
hyperproductivity, one can’t simply compete with machines. A good thought experiment in favor of various
disruptive and, on paper, terrible technological innovations is highlighted by the example
a professor gave to his class. Asking, “if an invention were offered that
would transform the economy and revolutionize economic efficiency, but in exchange we had
to sacrifice 40,000 lives a year, would politicians permit it?” The resounding response of the class was “definitely
not.” The professor then informed them that we do,
and it is, of course, the automobile. If you are someone who is inclined to reject
the forward trajectory of industry, what you might take from this is a criticism of cars. What that presents is the classic observation
by French economist Frederic Bastiat from his essay “That Which is Seen, and That
Which is Not Seen.” What we see are the 40,000 deaths directly
taken in consequence of automobiles; what are not seen and cannot be calculated are
the untold number of lives saved from the safe and quick transportation of services
such as medicine, emergency medical responses, and essential goods more broadly. Knowing where and how to draw this line will
be an eternal problem for humanity, but in the coming decades it will be like no time
before in human history as the rate of technological change goes parabolic. Even if flawed, it’s a conversation that
no candidate is having, and Andrew Yang is a positive inclusion in the culture and Democratic
debates if not for any other reason than this. Even further, as a strong advocate for vocational
schools, Yang may serve as a voice of reason in a party that wants to drive every American
through college to receive useless degrees. Unfortunately, far too many in the establishmentarian
and libertarian wings of the GOP look at any non-conventional solution to the issue of
cognitive stratification with shock and dismay. Andrew Yang frequently and correctly cites
Chicago School Economist and libertarian sweetheart Milton Friedman as a proponent of a UBI, as
well as numerous founding fathers in their advocacy of a form of it. Self-identified libertarian scholar, Charles
Murray is a vocal supporter of it, dedicating an entire book on the subject, titled “In
Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State.” That subtitle, “A Plan to Replace the Welfare
State”, is where some of its support from the right comes. It’s for this reason that the reflexive
libertarian gesticulation that this is an example of “socialism!” doesn’t hold
water and is simply inadequate. In theory, people like Friedman and Murray
endorse the UBI or its related proposal, a negative income tax, as a means of shifting
entitlements that leave vulnerable people dependent on the state to a form of independence. There are a variety of problems associated
with this argument. Even if the numbers added up (a contested
subject), it misses the fact that conservatives rightly recognize: people derive their primary
source of meaning from gainful and rewarding employment. The counterargument to this reality is that
at $1k/mo you’d still be beneath the poverty line, which wouldn’t remove the incentive
to work. It’s a fascinating thought experiment, at
a minimum, and that’s why so many on the right on the wide plane of social media have
become Yang-curious. Even assuming the math worked out, the appeal
of Yang transcends his policy prescriptions. At least $1000 is an entertaining thought
experiment; what would ensue if people were totally freed from scarcity–the problem economics
is trying to answer in the first place? It could solve a number of social issues such
as exploitative relationships or ease the transition from an unsatisfying job to another
one. But it doesn’t answer many, many more, such
as the spiritual malaise this country is undergoing that Yang understands. He identifies the pervasive depression and
disillusionment of the youth. That harkening to a brighter, more optimistic
past is what offered a lot of young people a reprieve in Make America Great Again, whatever
it is that you believe it signifies. At a minimum it is a rebuke of the factual
reality of social suicide we’re seeing spike rapidly. In the last few decades, there has been a
lot of concern over the societal “Death of the West” as Patrick Buchanan’s book
and Jonah Goldberg’s “Suicide of the West” label it respectively. In some cases you can judge a book by its
cover. Though Trump and Yang stand in stark contrast
to each other philosophically, to their supporters they read the writing on the wall, even as
figures and outlets like Human Progress, Steven Pinker, and Ben Shapiro insist upon impotently
reminding us of how optimistic we should be as our countrymen sink deeper and deeper into
a spiritual and, increasingly literal, suicide.

Otis Rodgers



  1. GZA036 Posted on July 4, 2019 at 7:24 pm

    Looking forward to the July debate so we can watch Yang bomb again LOL
    . The gang can rationalize the first one but they are gonna be pissed when he flops again

  2. Allen Fepuleai Posted on July 5, 2019 at 9:22 pm

    Those hats look lame. I support Andrew but you won’t catch me wearing that hat

  3. plobezuki Posted on July 6, 2019 at 8:16 am

    https://www.yang2020.com/ #AndrewYang2020 #Yang2020 #YangGang #FreedomDividend #SecureTheBag #YangGangLove #LetYangSpeak

  4. ChoppaCast Posted on July 6, 2019 at 12:11 pm

    "I don't want to search meaning for my life and build a family by myself. Government has to provide me meaning and incentives for having children"

    Right-wing version of a nanny state utopia

  5. hamiltondrew Posted on July 8, 2019 at 3:23 pm

    For all the ignorant people out there UBI is not socialist or communist. It is a capitalist solution to the threat of a new industrial revolution

  6. JumboShrimp _223 Posted on July 10, 2019 at 2:39 am

    Yang will never be POTUS because the ENTIRE Democrat party, Democrat establishment, The progressives, etc. will NEVER allow it. Sad.

  7. Angel Del Billar Posted on July 11, 2019 at 3:00 am

    Yang is not a single issue candidate!

  8. Nina Klinkhammer Posted on July 11, 2019 at 10:04 pm

    I felt like the speed of your talking in this was sped up? It was super hard to understand.

  9. joseph watson Posted on July 12, 2019 at 6:56 am

    6:26 NPR/Marxist Poll sounds about right.

  10. Jeremy Santos Posted on July 12, 2019 at 8:07 am

    Yang 2020

  11. Jim Brauer Posted on July 13, 2019 at 2:01 pm

    YANG 2020 / FREEDOM DIVIDEND / M4A / Humanity First / Abundance Mindset / $1,000 per mo per adult / Solution to POVERTY = CASH in the hands of Parents and Teachers !!! YANG = YES !!!

  12. Jeremy Newcombe Posted on July 13, 2019 at 2:19 pm

    Uhhhhhhhh, most supporters of yang are on the left. It's just we are open to all sides of the political spectrum so conservatives are much more open.

  13. Il76 Mainstay Posted on July 14, 2019 at 9:22 pm

    We are going to stumble upon the second renaissance.

  14. PA R Posted on July 15, 2019 at 3:12 am

    When everything becomes automated, humans will become too individualistic, which equals loneliness, which at that point, we will cease to want to exist

  15. Hustle Build Establish Posted on July 16, 2019 at 6:26 pm


  16. FishyLogic Posted on July 20, 2019 at 6:51 am

    This guy talks so fast I had to check if I was watching at 2x speed.

  17. John Leiman Posted on July 22, 2019 at 5:25 pm

    Yang: I mean, it's really… dark.
    aLsO yAnG: hUe HuE hUe

  18. Cherry Berry Posted on July 22, 2019 at 11:07 pm

    for some reason the narrator's head looks disproportionally huge

  19. azeri Posted on July 23, 2019 at 4:05 am

    Is this video sped up or did I drink too much?

  20. Pancho Northmann Posted on July 23, 2019 at 4:58 am

    Lol, Trump failed to stem illegal immigration. That's mildly simplified. That's like saying Native Americans/First Nations failed to avoid new world colonialism. Has any executive ever faced a more concerted effort to be stymied at every turn? Even the RINOs fought him with both houses in the red. You can watch hours of speeches over multiple decades encouraging, praising and demanding border and immigration enforcement GIVEN by the very same people today directly impeding immigration enforcement. Honk much?

    The Mafiosi at the top sucking society dry are happy to collude with the globalists in the destruction of this country. It lines their pockets while weakening their serf adversaries. And the OneWorlders love the financial support. In many cases it's two sides of the same coin. We have the Estates General all over again. All this crap is orchestrated and Trump came along and screwed it all up being a loud buffoon. The last hiccup of a dying once truly mighty empire succumbing to the Gibbme Brigades and the Handout Hoard.

    The true currency of a stable republic is morality: that agreements be sacred, that we do what we say. Very few at the helm have any integrity any longer, and half the country at large has all but lost the meaning of the word. Remember that "by any means necessary" is the death knell of integrity and subsequently liberty… Yang thinks it's necessary to pay people $12,000/year.

  21. Crazy Drew Posted on July 25, 2019 at 12:13 pm

    Yang is a Chinese shill.

  22. Smug ass Isabelle Posted on August 1, 2019 at 5:53 am

    If it weren't for your video I wouldn't have known about Yang or his policies, and now I'm fully on board with the Yang Gang now. Thank you.

  23. Рон Браун Posted on August 1, 2019 at 5:05 pm

    This hasn't aged well…

  24. Piped and drought Posted on August 7, 2019 at 11:13 pm

    Yang gang going to 2100
    Trump going to 1789
    Bernie going to 2030
    Warren going to 2025
    Pete going to 2070

  25. Ho Tang Chu Posted on August 8, 2019 at 5:27 am

    Very nice summary! Thanks.

  26. Wilder A. Matthias Posted on August 8, 2019 at 3:27 pm

    Reduces speed to 0.75x so mush brain can keep up.

  27. Bonzi Buddy Posted on August 9, 2019 at 6:40 pm

    Suicides are going to continue to go up because people are being raised to being unable to cope with life.

  28. Alco Goblin Posted on August 11, 2019 at 12:45 pm

    I think a good solution to slowing automation down, is reducing or removing the minimum wage laws. That way companies are less incentivised to automate since the cheap labour, would be cheap. However, this of course has to come along with reducing the inflation somehow… in any case, it's a very, very complex issue.

  29. Matt Miller Posted on August 13, 2019 at 3:48 am

    im enjoying your content

  30. Jonny Robin Posted on August 13, 2019 at 4:54 am

    I would encourage anyone who doesn’t agree with Andrew Yang to watch the joe Rogan podcast with andrew yang. I was 100% against UBI and did not want to watch anything with yang in it because I thought it was a bunch of garbage. After watching the FULL PODCAST, it completely changed my mind. I registered as a democrat so I could vote for Yang and he’s the first political campaign I have ever donated too.

  31. Michael Glennon Posted on August 13, 2019 at 7:18 am

    People like Yang will heal the sharp polarization that has suddenly formed in the last 4 years in US politics. Like Old media, old politicians need to go asap.

  32. FrostByte Posted on August 13, 2019 at 3:17 pm

    This video is so well produced. Especially love the Yang2020 hats on the conveyor belt.

  33. neil Posted on August 13, 2019 at 10:36 pm

    sorry, didnt catch that. could you repeat it?

  34. neil Posted on August 13, 2019 at 10:37 pm

    you can t3ll this guy did debate in high school

  35. Michel Aguilera Posted on August 15, 2019 at 5:22 am

    I love everything he proposes except the UBI

  36. YoutubeAndrewYang Posted on August 15, 2019 at 3:21 pm

    trump has found himself, unfortunately, in a situation beyond is control, …..and now he is stuck. Too bad, I liked him as a civilian.
    #IndependentsforYang #yang2020

  37. Bepis Bann Posted on August 16, 2019 at 2:42 am

    That part with the conveyer belt with the yang hat has major I get the bag by Gucci mane and slippery by migos vibes

  38. David Rosol Posted on August 16, 2019 at 1:55 pm

    Yang is prophetic, I've never seen someone who has as much foresight as him.

  39. wardkdouglas Posted on August 17, 2019 at 11:45 pm

    I don't even think Yang himself understands Yang Gang.

  40. Snowtep Posted on August 18, 2019 at 2:51 am

    People should have started to be worried once excel and macros was introduced to the workplace. Literally can do the job of 100 number crunchers in a single sitting these days. Taxes used to take hours to do in my father's generation. It takes me minutes.

  41. Wings of Purity Official Posted on August 20, 2019 at 8:21 pm

    If you like Yang, register to vote for him in the democratic primaries!

  42. Deborah Tulloch Posted on August 25, 2019 at 4:35 am

    You guys can choose the speed of the video in settings at the top of the video.

  43. Daniel Bowman Posted on August 25, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    UBI aka Negative Income tax is fine provided it replaces all other kind of welfare support.

    That won't happen because:
    Left would be out of freebies for voters.
    Recipients will smoke up their UBI and then what? Ask for more.

    It won't help with psychological issues like having a purpose.
    We will be incentivizing Idiocracy – low IQ will be able to procreate without hassle.

  44. Stoner Shag Posted on August 25, 2019 at 11:55 pm

    In Yang we trust

  45. Mial isus Posted on August 26, 2019 at 9:03 am

    Don't even like all this shilling going about it.
    But I will die laughing hard if Yang fails to gib dats 1000 bucksaroo to everyone who voted him.
    God, I want him to win just to see all the soycuck tears who feel empowered because they can vote.

  46. soft cream Posted on August 26, 2019 at 10:30 am

    I'd even say some of the suicides are connected to addiction as well. I used to be a active user with life altering Crohn's and there was many times during active using that I thought of ending it. I've been clean for 4 years and haven't had them thoughts since even tho I had the worst medical situation/surgery a year ago

  47. Troll Masters Posted on August 27, 2019 at 5:11 am

    Learn how to work on Robots like me! If you don't want a robot to take your job learn how to fix them…

  48. theb1rd Posted on August 27, 2019 at 8:52 pm

    The market has made a fool of every central planner ever, regardless of talent. Yang will be no different.

  49. rickpur100 Posted on August 27, 2019 at 11:22 pm

    “…carving out millions of hu-white collar jobs” (Charles Murray tears off mask to reveal that he is actually Jared Taylor.)

  50. Meow Gatoo Posted on August 28, 2019 at 12:33 am

    1) I struggle to find a job because no employer wants to train. 2) Where is the $1000 coming from in Yang's proposals? I went to college and regret it, I have no debt but it has not helped me in any way and I feel like my money was wasted.

  51. bob Bunni Posted on August 28, 2019 at 3:06 am

    Job market is growing…. wth is he talking about….or is it the depend on me because the future is bleak for you on your own?

    Automation fear tatic….used in politics for decades.

  52. bob Bunni Posted on August 28, 2019 at 3:13 am

    FREE MONEY FOR EVERYONE! Vote for him….lol my gawd.

  53. paincult Posted on August 28, 2019 at 3:16 pm

    The way that this video brings to surface all my suspicions about the world economy really hits home.

  54. Muzammel Gouhary Posted on August 29, 2019 at 4:32 am

    Who else had this pop up in their recommended?

  55. Ace Posted on August 29, 2019 at 1:54 pm

    For me it's either yang or Bernie only these guys know the real problems and have real solutions

  56. noah nicholas Posted on August 29, 2019 at 6:12 pm

    Wish you would use some facts for how he's gonna pay for ubi

    Thought you liked facts

    The us is moving into dtm stage four of course birth rates are low and suicide rates are hgh

  57. How I made Posted on August 30, 2019 at 11:53 pm

    you only got a new sub cause theres yang in the title

  58. Blue Posted on August 31, 2019 at 3:39 pm

    only people who'd vote yang just want free money

  59. BladeMasterz916 Posted on September 1, 2019 at 5:43 pm

    UBI is the future, robotics takes most jobs. Humans can now focus on advancement and saving the planet. With all the smartest people not doing pointless jobs, humanity will advance much faster. Then we become cyborg and uplink our conscious selves and become immortal. We then start to evolve and shed our human bodies which is limited. We now can travel in space power by fusion and robotic body. That is how humans will survive, we have to shed our bodies and evolve as robots.

  60. Robert Farquharson Posted on September 2, 2019 at 8:11 am

    Got a link for the "engineers' salaries" graph? Would love to use it (and give cred., of course)

  61. ford5522 Posted on September 2, 2019 at 6:34 pm

    Yang is an incredible moron! If there is that much money than there is zero excuse to ever cut Social Security a dime ever! In fact they could pay back what they cut in the past! Let the free loader earn theirs like those before them. Fact is those on Social Security can spend it just as good as the free loaders! AND THEY EARNED IT!!!!!!! All this idiot would do is inflate the shit out of our money and destroy those that already earned their Social Security ! As the idiot didn't think to include them. Remember Democrats stole the social security money to fund their Vietnam war! There are plenty of unfunded liabilities . Without starting a free bee give away for those that didn't earn it! Maybe yang should try it in Venezuela! After all it was free that put them in the spot they are in now! Yang is an idiot! LOOKING FOR SUCKERS! And the inflation he would cause would make our money worthless. I am sure China would love this idiots plan. Maybe he works for them! He is trying to kill the golden goose to get all the gold. Funny it never worked in the fairy tail either! WHAT A SURPRISE!

  62. Quigon Paj Posted on September 3, 2019 at 1:57 pm

    Man, it was SO fuckin' nice to watch a video on YouTube like this. I've been fascinated by the Yang candidacy since I first saw him on JRE. Politics aside, Yang is a farking GENIUS for having the perspicacity to expand the broader philosophical context of the prevailing political, economic, sociological, and ideological patterns in order to not just SEE these terrifying trends, but he's also brilliant for figuring out how to develop a new UBI to address it.

    He's heroic for embarking on his quixotic attempt to get the nomination, but he knows that it is the only way to get the message out there to folks who might be willing to listen, and able to help.

    Who knew that this group was no LONGER the democratic party…

  63. OneHourShower Posted on September 3, 2019 at 2:22 pm

    Dude thank you so much for doing this. You have my subscription pal.

  64. kebman Posted on September 4, 2019 at 11:14 am

    If Yang wins, it'll be like somebody voted to get 1929 Black Thursday all over again.

  65. DouceGoTechLX Posted on September 4, 2019 at 1:51 pm

    Yang really seems to just miss the mark for me on so many points. Suicide in men 50-54 is about unemployment, in an economy that has the most employees in American history…? Somehow, I don't think that's it, but I'm not running for president. Perhaps we might look at divorce. 9 of 10 divorce related suicides are committed by men. I can't imagine why men don't want to get married these days… Getting married in America today is signing up for a lifetime of financial hardship, or suicide, for the majority of men today who get married. Marriage can, and did have positive social impacts in our communities, but not as it's practiced today legally in America.

  66. Quigon Paj Posted on September 4, 2019 at 3:52 pm

    ANYONE who suddenly doesn't want to work simply because of the freedom dividend was never that serious about work ANYWAY, and is unlikely to find themselves in some existential crisis of meaning and purpose. That's a garbage argument.

    UBI is proposed because we are being transitioned away from a human labor economy. So the disillusionment of unemployment and underemployment (Or well-paid employment in an extremely stressful and demanding job) STILL EXISTS, for SO many people. And even IF someone WERE to drop out because they lost their motivation, it only opens up more opportunities for other people. The whole problem EXISTS precisely BECAUSE we are losing both MEANINGFUL jobs as WELL as shitty jobs.

    People who WANT to work, and have always had opportunities TO work, in jobs that were decent, paid alright, and have them a sense of pride are disappearing, through automation and globalization. Yet, we're a wealthy country. UBI is a way to help ensure a minimum level of shared prosperity among everyone, by tapping the sources of income (mostly) that have the highest margins. Back in the day, GE, Ford, GM, P&G, made fortunes smaller than Silicon Valley giants, yet employed more people by orders of magnitude that were previously unheard of. It will not hurt them at all.

    I just don't see this "work gives meaning, so UBI is bad" as a compelling argument against UBI

  67. Andrew Benner Posted on September 4, 2019 at 5:13 pm

    Since this he said he would give free healthcare and the vote to illegals, and called Trump a white supremacist. His math is wrong.

    This did not age well.

  68. kebman Posted on September 5, 2019 at 4:40 am

    Andrew Yang is just a new flavour of Communism. He will have to use force to redistribute all that money, and he's using fearmongering tactics to get his will.

  69. J.R. Vasquez Posted on September 6, 2019 at 2:31 am

    Excellent video! Thank you. You are well spoken and I only say this as constructive critique: slow your delivery down a bit.

  70. Daddy Tito Posted on September 6, 2019 at 4:50 pm

    This guy is pro social credit system. He’s an authoritarian prick.

  71. JC Korn Posted on September 6, 2019 at 4:55 pm

    If the Left's top objective is to stop Trump, they need to get behind this guy.
    The fact that he's running on giving $1000 a month to every American, a widely socialist idea, but is being propped up by the center and Trump voters…..not because of the handout but because of his ideas and plan.
    Yang would wipe the floor with Trump and turn red states blue.
    He understands the vital issues our country faces and he has a plan.

  72. Mente Valiente Posted on September 6, 2019 at 7:09 pm

    people don't believe in global warming believeing in automation catastrophy

  73. Vaughn Samson Posted on September 9, 2019 at 3:33 am

    Rewatching this bc there's no new PRA or Epstein episodes

  74. spoonfuloffructose Posted on September 10, 2019 at 5:46 am

    A UBI is $3.8 Trillion / year. That's the entire federal budget plus $500 Billion. The math just flat out does not work. Yang has barely any support. He's sitting at 2%-3% in the democratic polls and going nowhere. A UBI could never get through Congress, since you would have to essentially eliminate all the entitlement programs (i.e. the Third Rail of politics) to fund it (plus a massive tax hike). That would be immediate career suicide for any politician who supported it.

  75. Gudmundur Thor Karlsson Posted on September 10, 2019 at 3:44 pm

    Sam Harris is a closet NeoCon.

  76. Smüth Opheliac Posted on September 12, 2019 at 3:53 am

    Why do left wingers call Yang crazy? Where did this come from?

  77. Brass 'n Barrels Firearms Channel Posted on September 12, 2019 at 4:16 pm

    All part of the Great Replacement

  78. Casarek Boikovskiy Posted on September 12, 2019 at 8:34 pm

    ooph thats a big nose

  79. Spectar 123 Do Posted on September 14, 2019 at 4:23 am

    Dark & ominous but i kinda dig it. Packed with inform and I don't mind the fast pace. Got a lots out of it in a short amount of time.

  80. Bassless Loser Posted on September 14, 2019 at 6:53 pm

    Yang is ahead of his time. And no one will realize that till it’s to late.

  81. Julia Lerner Posted on September 15, 2019 at 3:29 am

    A lot of young people are going to be defaulting on their student loans when they can't find good jobs and we are not prepared for that.

  82. Dennis Waller Posted on September 15, 2019 at 4:01 am

    Wow, amazing work you guys! I've been holding off on watching this video and finally glad to watch. Very compelling. thank you.

  83. SpirareExpressions Posted on September 16, 2019 at 12:36 am

    I had to reduce the speed of the video to listen because the narrator is speaking too fast to understand the points.

  84. X X Posted on September 16, 2019 at 2:33 am

    usually i prefer to read about certain things when when ppl dont speak fast enough for my liking, not gonna lie i sometimes struggle to keep attention when certain ppl just babble slowly, but this rite here is just about right..

  85. Benjamin Lupton Posted on September 16, 2019 at 9:52 am

    My god. Transferring money does not transfer wealth. Why is it so hard for people to understand this. If everyone is given $1000 nothing changes as prices must adjust as scarcity was never adjusted. Job loss is only possible at lower costs of goods, there is no point selling goods that no one can afford, and there is no point replacing useless jobs. My god people, you are being sold snake oil through smoke and mirrors, it's all a sham.

  86. Omar Villarreal Posted on September 16, 2019 at 4:04 pm

    Did anyone else have to check the playback speed? Man, 1.25 speed engaged!

  87. Kevin Warburton Posted on September 16, 2019 at 10:23 pm

    Non-Repetitive manual work …bring back the Artisan/Craftsman & small workshops.

  88. Grundle Munch Posted on September 18, 2019 at 12:32 am

    I'm literally Andrew Yang

  89. 206 guy Posted on September 18, 2019 at 11:37 am

    Depression, anxiety, suicide is up, Americans are stemming back to drugs again. Divorce is up. The agreement of marriage and having children are down. Life expectancy has went down in the US for the first time since 1800s. Entering the fourth industrial revolution, the last thing we need is American job being outsourced and automated without a foundation to help these people. We need something big to happen in this 4th industrial revolution and I think that is a universal basic income.

  90. m MMM Posted on September 18, 2019 at 8:24 pm

    O' I'm Yang-curious! Give me a smattering of the Yang-Gang please! Not too much! Don't break me!

  91. OnixTV Posted on September 19, 2019 at 10:27 am

    Andrew Yang and maybe even Tulsi Gabbard seem to be the only moderate Democrats on the lineup.

  92. Jeff Faircloth Posted on September 19, 2019 at 11:42 am

    We're tired and in pain beat up you don't get the proper medication because of this stupid war on opiates has nothing to do with people that are hurt or governments have been flooding the streets with drugs for years and turning a blind eye to all the money run operations there's a lot of people hurt that can't get their medication because of this one is me and I am at that age you said and I can't even play with my grandchildren worked my whole life 30 years till my body fell apart literally I love my grandson the stress of bills and the pain oh my joints don't know how much longer I can hold on you need to leave the real doctors alone and let them treat people that are really hurt and don't treat them like they're on probation I refuse to go to pain management I will not be treated like Criminal because I was injured we also need Trust love and compassion if a doctor can't tell true pain just by looking into a man's eyes or woman then he's not worth a shit anyway I took care of my mother and father until their last day did everything they needed gave them their medicine clean them I watch them suffer for 20 or 30 years the only thing that kept him alive what's their medication pain medication that is the rest of that shit they were giving them probably killed them but I was told to give it to them I had to literally me and my 80 year old father take my mother who was better rating every month to pain management just so they could see her do you know how painful that was for all of us to get her in that car and back home absolutely ridiculous there should be a war on institutions not opiates I Believe In You yang we need help we need proper Health Care and we need to be able to afford it don't fuck with Social Security or Medicare peace and love to Humanity

  93. Jeff Faircloth Posted on September 19, 2019 at 11:46 am

    I want truth and honesty I don't care how bad it hurts whoever gets you better do the right thing this time that's all I can tell you to stay in going to have another chance you think these other countries are going crazy you ain't seen shit all these people sitting around with the billion-dollar shit their lives are going to change real quick don't think you can hide underground who the fuck you think built those bunkers the last fuck you're going to get is your head up your ass all of you do the right thing

  94. Alex de Guzman Posted on September 20, 2019 at 4:21 pm

    I'm just here for the hat

  95. just a sandwich Posted on September 21, 2019 at 1:09 pm

    focus on saying as much as you are saying now but with less words and/or slower pacing. Put your focus on the viewers reception of your messages. You never stop talking to allow a moment of mental digestion. See nerdwriter for what I consider decent pacing. Even Andrew Yang's pacing is a great thing to emulate. Your videos are fantasticly high quality keep it up please. I can't get this kind of content from very many creators.

  96. Michelle H Posted on September 22, 2019 at 10:56 am

    Why such glum music? Yang is a happy, vibrant, exciting dude!